Search for: "C. R.C. C."
Results 1 - 20
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that in an employee-initiated action under the state’s “prevailing wage” statute, when a court finds that a contractor has failed to pay workers the prevailing wage for work on a public improvement project, the court must assess against the employer not only a judgment for the amount of the plaintiffs’ underpaid wages, but also the financial penalties set forth in R.C. 4115.10(A), unless the violation falls under one of two… [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 9:23 am
§ 3796.09(C) to be stricken from R.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
Zachary C. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Further, R.C. 2307.60 states that civil actions exist for damages caused by criminal acts. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
R.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:18 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that when a party in a civil lawsuit moves for a stay of trial pending arbitration of the dispute, and the trial court issues an order granting or denying the requested stay, R.C. 2711.02(C) permits an immediate appeal of the trial court’s order, even when that order does not include a judicial determination that there is “no just cause for delay” in pursuing an appeal as required by Civil Rule 54(B). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:16 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that in capital murder cases where a trial court is required to file a separate sentencing opinion setting forth the court’s specific findings regarding a death sentence, a “final appealable order” consists of both the court’s judgment of conviction filed pursuant to Criminal Rule 32(C), and its sentencing opinion filed pursuant to R.C.2929.03(F). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
(It summarily disregarded his “due process” assertions, given that R.C. had notice of the charges, was represented by counsel, appeared at the hearing, the record contained a certified transcript of the hearing, and the hearing officer only used records that were formally entered into evidence.)Looks like R.C. couldn’t cop it sweet there ….# # #DECISIONMatter of C. v Shea [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:42 am
Donald C. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Judge Robert C. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:46 am
Myers Company (2012-Ohio-5317) that substantially limits the definition of “deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard” necessary to create a rebuttable presumption of intent under Ohio’s Employer Intentional Tort Statute, R.C. 2745.01(C). [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:15 pm
The trial court sentenced defendant Adam Bowers to 25 years to life for rape under R.C. 2971.03(B)(1)(c), finding that he “had compelled the victim to submit by force. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
§2735.04(C) empowers the court to “require an additional deposit” (to be deposited by the requesting or consenting parties) “to cover funds” that will be expensed pursuant to a R.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:27 am
This post was authored by Beth Gazes ’20, Touro Law Center In an action brought by a landowner seeking declaration of entitlement to approval of a subdivision pursuant to state statute R.C. 711.09(C) (the “Statute”), the Court, in affirming the Eighth District Court of Appeals, held that the Statute pre-empts the land use and zoning decision-making authority of the City of Broadview Heights (the “City”) since, under Kearns, where a city’s… [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
“By any fair reading of Crim.R. 11(C)(2), the potential R.C. 2929.141(A) sentence was part of the ‘maximum penalty involved’ in this case. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm
Because we have had formatting issues with the emails since the change in our design, the emails will now just include the blog headline and a link to … Continue reading → The post Merit Decision: Judgment Creditor of City Employee Cannot Assert Right of Indemnification Against the City Under R.C.2744.07. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:20 pm
Criteria for Exemption Could Vary Criteria provided by R.C. 5709 provides guidance on whether a 501(c)(3) would be determined to be a charitable institution eligible for exemption. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:27 pm
More specifically, the Court concluded that R.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:08 pm
In H.K. v R.C., the Supreme Court, New York County, was asked to decide whether a parent’s request to relocate over the objection of the noncustodial parent was in the best interests of the child. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am
Affinity Medical filed a post-trial motion to have the court apply the cap on noneconomic damages set forth in R.C. 2315.18(B)(2) and the cap on punitive damages in R.C. 2315.21(D) to reduce the jury award. [read post]
